Glyphosate and White Phosphorus
Your Daily #InstrumIntel for Monday, 3.9.2
Welcome to the Daily #InstrumIntel, where we break down what you need to know, and why, using What? So What? Now What?.
Jump to Section:
Trump's War on Iran • Politics • The Trump Administration • Climate & Environment • AI & Tech • Culture & Media • Education • What the Right is Reading • Strays
Trump's War on Iran
Headline: The Long-Feared Persian Gulf Oil Squeeze Is Upon Us | WSJ
What?
On March 8, 2026, Joe Wallace, Summer Said, Rebecca Feng, and Georgi Kantchev reported that the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz has caused a severe energy crisis, with oil prices soaring above $100 per barrel. The crisis began after the United States and Israel attacked Iran, leading to a significant reduction in oil output from Iraq and Kuwait, and impacting global oil and natural gas supplies.
So What?
This disruption threatens the global economy by increasing energy prices and affecting supply chains, particularly in Europe and Asia. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil and liquefied natural gas supplies, could lead to further economic instability and geopolitical tensions.
WTF?
Despite the strait not being officially closed, over 1,000 ships are waiting to pass through due to fears of attacks, with some vessels having been struck, resulting in casualties.
Now What?
Watch for potential U.S. and allied military actions to secure the Strait of Hormuz and ensure the flow of energy supplies. Additionally, monitor any diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions between the involved nations. The situation could evolve rapidly, impacting global energy markets and international relations.
Headline: Trump to Times of Israel: It’ll be a ‘mutual’ decision with Netanyahu regarding when Iran war ends
What?
On March 8, 2026, US President Donald Trump told The Times of Israel that the decision to end the war with Iran will be a "mutual" one made with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump emphasized that while Netanyahu will have input, he will make the final decision at the appropriate time. The US and Israel launched the war on February 28, 2026, with a strike that killed Iran's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei.
So What?
This development underscores the significant influence Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has over US decision-making in the conflict with Iran. It also highlights the potential for extended military engagement, as the US has not committed to a specific timeline for the war's conclusion.
WTF?
President Trump called Israeli President Isaac Herzog a "disgrace" for not pardoning Netanyahu, who is on trial for alleged bribery, fraud, and breach of trust.
Now What?
Watch for any official statements from the White House or Israeli government regarding the timeline for the war with Iran. Additionally, monitor developments in Netanyahu's legal proceedings, as they may impact his political standing and influence in the ongoing conflict.
Headline: Video Shows US Tomahawk Missile Strike Next to Girls’ School in Iran - bellingcat
What?
New video footage released by Mehr News and geolocated by Bellingcat shows a United States Tomahawk missile hitting an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps facility in Minab, Iran, on February 28, 2026. The footage also reveals smoke rising from the vicinity of a girls’ school where 175 people were reportedly killed, contradicting U.S. President Donald Trump’s claim that an Iranian missile hit the school.
So What?
This revelation could escalate tensions between the United States and Iran, as it challenges the official narrative provided by the U.S. government. It raises questions about accountability and transparency in military operations, potentially impacting diplomatic relations and international perceptions of U.S. military actions.
WTF?
The footage shows a Tomahawk missile strike near a girls’ school, resulting in the reported deaths of 175 people, including children.
Now What?
Watch for potential international responses or investigations into the incident, which may lead to calls for accountability from the United States. Monitoring any official statements or policy changes from the U.S. government regarding military operations in Iran will be crucial.
Headline: Iran's choice of Mojtaba Khamenei appears to close path to swift end to war
What?
On March 9, 2026, Iran named Mojtaba Khamenei as the new supreme leader following the death of his father, Ali Khamenei, signaling the continued dominance of hardliners in the country's political landscape. This decision comes amid ongoing conflict in the Middle East, with significant implications for global energy markets as oil prices surge due to disruptions in supply.
So What?
The appointment of Mojtaba Khamenei as Iran's supreme leader suggests a continuation of hardline policies, potentially prolonging the conflict in the Middle East and exacerbating the global energy crisis. This development could further strain international relations, particularly with the United States and Israel, who have expressed opposition to Iran's current regime.
Now What?
Observers should monitor potential diplomatic responses from the United States and Israel, as well as any shifts in military strategies in the region. The impact on global oil markets will also be crucial, with potential legislative or regulatory actions to address the energy crisis. Further developments in Iran's domestic policies under Mojtaba Khamenei's leadership will be key to understanding the future trajectory of the conflict.
Headline: Khamenei’s son chosen as Iran’s supreme leader, extending hardline rule
What?
On March 8, 2026, Iran's assembly of top Shiite clerics selected Mojtaba Khamenei, son of the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as the new supreme leader. This decision, announced by state media, comes amid ongoing conflict with the United States and Israel, following the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during an attack on February 28, 2026.
So What?
The appointment of Mojtaba Khamenei, a figure with strong ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, signals a continuation of hardline theocratic rule in Iran. This move defies U.S. President Donald Trump's expectations of influencing Iran's leadership choice and may further escalate tensions between Iran and its adversaries.
Now What?
Observers should monitor potential retaliatory actions from Israel and the United States, as well as any shifts in Iran's domestic and foreign policy under Mojtaba Khamenei's leadership. The international community will be watching for any developments in the ongoing conflict and the impact on regional stability.
Headline: U.S. Dismayed by Israel's Strikes on Iranian Fuel Depots | Axios
What?
On March 8, 2026, Axios reported that Israel's strikes on 30 Iranian fuel depots have caused a significant rift with the United States. The strikes, which were more extensive than the U.S. anticipated, led to large fires in Tehran and have raised concerns about their strategic impact and potential to increase oil prices.
So What?
The U.S. fears that targeting infrastructure serving ordinary Iranians could rally public support for the Iranian regime and destabilize oil markets, potentially driving up global energy prices. This disagreement marks a notable strain in U.S.-Israel relations amid ongoing conflict.
WTF?
An Israeli official described the U.S. reaction to the strikes as "WTF."
Now What?
Watch for potential diplomatic discussions between the U.S. and Israel to address the strategic implications of military actions in the region. Monitoring oil market responses and any subsequent military actions will be crucial in the coming weeks.
Headline: Sources Briefed on Iran War Say U.S. Has No Plans for What Comes Next
What?
On March 5, 2026, The Intercept reported that the Trump administration's military actions against Iran lack a clear strategy or plan for the aftermath, according to four government officials briefed on the situation. Despite classified briefings, officials have not articulated a coherent rationale or endgame for the conflict, which has resulted in significant civilian casualties and regional instability.
So What?
The absence of a strategic plan for the U.S. war on Iran risks prolonged conflict and regional destabilization, echoing the long-term consequences of past U.S. interventions in the Middle East. This could lead to decades of instability and anti-American sentiment, similar to the aftermath of the 1953 coup in Iran.
WTF?
President Donald Trump suggested that the U.S. could establish a puppet regime in Iran, similar to the one in Venezuela, following the kidnapping of Nicolás Maduro.
Now What?
Observers should monitor potential legislative or judicial challenges to the legality of the U.S. actions in Iran, particularly in light of Executive Order 12333, which bans assassinations. Additionally, watch for developments in U.S.-Iran relations and any international responses to the conflict.
Headline: Lebanon: Israel Unlawfully Using White Phosphorus
What?
On March 3, 2026, the Israeli military unlawfully used artillery-fired white phosphorus munitions over homes in the southern Lebanese town of Yohmor, according to Human Rights Watch. The organization verified images showing the deployment of these munitions over residential areas, which is considered indiscriminate under international humanitarian law.
So What?
The use of white phosphorus in populated areas poses severe risks to civilians, potentially causing death or lifelong injuries. This action by the Israeli military could lead to accusations of war crimes and further escalate tensions in the region, contributing to civilian displacement and international condemnation.
Now What?
Lebanon's judicial authorities may initiate investigations into these actions as serious international crimes. Human Rights Watch has urged Israel's allies to suspend military assistance and arms sales to Israel. The situation calls for monitoring any developments regarding Lebanon's potential accession to the International Criminal Court's Rome Statute.
Headline: Special Ops To Get The Uranium
What?
On March 2026, Lawyers, Guns & Money discusses the potential for a special operations raid to seize Iran's enriched uranium stockpile, which is believed to be located in Isfahan. The article highlights the logistical and safety challenges of such an operation, including the transportation and handling of uranium hexafluoride gas stored in heavy metal cylinders.
So What?
The potential raid poses significant risks, including the possibility of escalating military conflict and the challenge of safely securing or destroying the uranium to prevent its use in nuclear weapons. The situation underscores the complexities of nuclear non-proliferation efforts in volatile regions.
WTF?
The article notes that uranium, enriched or otherwise, is only slightly more radioactive than dirt, countering misconceptions about its potential use in a dirty bomb.
Now What?
Watch for developments in international diplomatic efforts to address Iran's nuclear capabilities and any military actions that could impact regional stability. Monitoring the United Nations' involvement in non-proliferation discussions may provide further insights into potential resolutions.
Headline: Iranian Attacks On Prized Missile Defense Radars Are A Wake-Up Call
What?
On March 5, 2026, TWZ reported that Iran has targeted and damaged key missile defense radars in the Middle East, including the U.S. AN/TPY-2 radar in Jordan and the AN/FPS-132 radar in Qatar. These attacks are part of Iran's retaliation against the ongoing joint U.S.-Israeli air campaign.
So What?
The destruction and damage of these radars highlight the vulnerability of critical defense infrastructure to drone attacks, potentially degrading the region's missile defense capabilities and situational awareness. This could lead to increased risks of successful missile and drone strikes by Iran.
Now What?
Watch for U.S. military efforts to replace and reinforce damaged radar systems in the Middle East, as well as potential legislative discussions on funding and deploying advanced radar technologies. Further developments in U.S.-Iran relations and regional defense strategies are also expected.
What?
On March 3, 2026, Media Matters reported that right-wing Christian media figures are praising President Donald Trump's decision to join Israel in military strikes against Iran, claiming it fulfills biblical prophecy. Figures like Gene Bailey and Lance Wallnau likened Trump to historical figures such as Cyrus the Great, suggesting the conflict could signal the emergence of the Antichrist and the End Times.
So What?
This narrative could influence public perception and policy by framing geopolitical actions as divinely ordained, potentially escalating tensions and impacting diplomatic relations. It also highlights the intersection of religion and politics in shaping foreign policy decisions.
WTF?
A military commander reportedly told officers that President Trump is “anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.”
Now What?
Watch for potential legislative or diplomatic responses to the U.S.-Israeli military actions in Iran, particularly from international bodies like the United Nations. Additionally, monitor any shifts in U.S. domestic policy regarding the separation of church and state as these religious narratives gain traction.
Politics
Headline: Inside the Plot to Nationalize the 2026 Midterms
What?
On a recent date, House Democrats, led by Hakeem Jeffries and Joe Morelle, are preparing to counter potential election interference by Donald Trump in the 2026 midterms. They are creating a party-wide apparatus to respond to any efforts to subvert the vote, with Sen. Alex Padilla leading similar efforts in the Senate. Meanwhile, Trump has been advocating for nationalized election laws and stricter voter ID requirements.
So What?
The potential nationalization of election laws and increased federal control over elections could undermine state authority and democratic norms. This situation poses a significant risk to the integrity of the electoral process and could lead to increased voter suppression.
WTF?
A draft executive order circulating among conservative activists proposes declaring a national emergency to justify unprecedented federal control over elections, including the creation of a national voter registry and the elimination of vote-by-mail.
Now What?
Watch for developments regarding the SAVE Act and any executive orders related to election control. Pay attention to legal challenges from groups like Democracy Forward and potential actions by the Department of Justice. The situation in Georgia, where Trump is involved in an investigation into the 2020 vote count, also warrants close monitoring.
Headline: Warnock, Ossoff back bill to limit investor-owned houses
What?
On March 26, 2026, U.S. Senator Raphael Warnock, a Democrat from Atlanta, collaborated with Ohio Republican Senator Bernie Moreno to introduce a provision in the ROAD to Housing Act. This bipartisan bill aims to limit corporations with more than 350 homes from purchasing additional properties, with the goal of increasing housing affordability by reducing corporate ownership in the home-buying market.
So What?
The legislation could significantly impact housing affordability by curbing the influence of large corporations in the real estate market, potentially making it easier for individual families to purchase homes. This move aligns with broader efforts to address housing inequities, particularly in areas like metro Atlanta where corporate ownership is high.
Now What?
The U.S. Senate is expected to vote on the bill next week, with bipartisan support anticipated. However, the provision faces opposition in the House, particularly from the National Association of Home Builders. Observers should watch for potential amendments to Warnock's provision and the bill's progress through the legislative process.
Headline: Court Enjoins Florida's CAIR "domestic terrorist organization" Designation
What?
On Wednesday, a federal court enjoined an Executive Order signed by Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida, which designated the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as a "domestic terrorist organization" under Florida law. This action followed similar measures in Texas and other efforts to revoke CAIR's tax-exempt status across the United States.
So What?
The court's injunction limits the power of state executives to unilaterally label organizations as terrorist entities, reinforcing judicial oversight over such designations. This decision may impact similar actions in other states, potentially preserving CAIR's operational status and tax-exempt status nationwide.
Now What?
Observers should watch for potential appeals by the state of Florida and any legislative responses that might seek to redefine or reinforce the criteria for designating organizations as terrorist entities. The outcome of these developments could set significant precedents for state-level authority over non-profit organizations.
What?
On March 6, 2026, Gazetteer SF reported that Charles McLaughlin operates Brotherhood of Light Recordings, a Neo-Nazi and fascist music label, from an apartment in the Tenderloin, San Francisco. The label, identified by anti-fascist researchers Bay161, distributes extremist music globally and has been linked to white supremacist ideology.
So What?
This revelation highlights the ongoing presence and influence of far-right extremism in the Bay Area, posing risks of radicalization and ethnic intimidation. It underscores the need for vigilance and action against hate groups that use music as a recruitment tool.
WTF?
Brotherhood of Light Recordings promotes music with explicit Nazi references, including a band named Rassenschande, which is a term for the Nazi party’s anti-race-mixing program.
Now What?
Authorities and community organizations may need to monitor and address the activities of extremist groups in the area. Legislative or regulatory measures could be considered to curb the spread of hate music and propaganda. Further developments in this case could impact local policy and community safety initiatives.
Headline: Proton Mail Helped FBI Unmask Anonymous ‘Stop Cop City’ Protester
What?
On an unspecified date, privacy-focused email provider Proton Mail provided Swiss authorities with payment data, which the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) used to identify an individual allegedly behind an anonymous account linked to the Stop Cop City movement in Atlanta. The account was associated with the Defend the Atlanta Forest group, which was under investigation for arson, vandalism, and doxing related to protests against a police training center near Intrenchment Creek Park in Atlanta.
So What?
This development highlights the potential for privacy-focused services to be compelled to share user data with authorities, raising concerns about the limits of privacy protections under Swiss law. It also underscores the ongoing tension between law enforcement objectives and civil liberties in the context of protest movements.
Now What?
Observers should monitor any legal challenges or policy changes regarding data privacy and law enforcement access to encrypted communications, particularly in Switzerland and the United States. Additionally, the outcome of the investigations into the Stop Cop City movement may set precedents for how similar cases are handled in the future.
The Trump Administration
boy in retrospect, really shouldn’t have elected the worst person in the entire country president. that, it appears, was less than wise
— ryan cooper (@ryanlcooper.com) March 8, 2026 at 10:46 PM
Key Details of 13-Year-Old Trump Accuser’s Accounts Are Verified | Thedailybeast
What?
The Daily Beast reports that a woman who accused Donald Trump of sexual abuse when she was 13 provided verifiable details about her life in interviews with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 2019. The Post and Courier corroborated several aspects of her life using archived government records and news reports, although none of the newly verified details relate directly to her accusations about Trump.
So What?
The verification of the woman's background details adds credibility to her account, potentially increasing scrutiny on Donald Trump's past associations with Jeffrey Epstein. This development may influence ongoing discussions about accountability and transparency in cases involving high-profile individuals.
WTF?
The woman alleged that Trump said to her, "Let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be," during the alleged abuse.
Now What?
Watch for any further legal actions or investigations that may arise from the release of the Epstein files and the corroborated details of the accuser's background. The Department of Justice's handling of these files and any subsequent legislative or judicial responses will be critical to monitor.
What?
Federal ethics disclosures published on March 4, 2026, reveal that former President Donald Trump made over 170 investment purchases between May and November 2025, primarily in securities tied to major financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase. These transactions were disclosed late, with Trump paying late filing fees, and occurred while his administration dismantled the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which oversaw these banks.
So What?
Trump's investments in banks that benefited from his administration's deregulatory actions highlight potential conflicts of interest, as sitting presidents are exempt from certain ethics laws that apply to other federal officials. This situation underscores the limitations of current ethics regulations in holding a president accountable for financial activities that may influence policy decisions.
WTF?
Within days of taking office in January 2025, Trump's acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Russell Vought, closed the agency's headquarters and ordered all staff to stop work, effectively dismantling the agency.
Now What?
Watch for potential legislative efforts to close the legal gap that allows sitting presidents to engage in financial activities that could influence policy decisions without facing conflict-of-interest penalties. Additionally, monitor any further actions by the Department of Justice regarding ethics violations by former presidents.
Headline: DOJ appeals rulings that blocked Trump orders targeting major law firms
What?
On March 7, 2026, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) appealed rulings by four federal judges that blocked President Donald Trump's executive orders targeting major law firms. The orders, which were blocked last year, aimed to penalize firms like Jenner & Block, Perkins Coie, Susman Godfrey, and WilmerHale by limiting access to federal buildings and suspending security clearances, among other measures.
So What?
This appeal represents a significant legal confrontation between the executive branch and the judiciary, challenging the balance of power and the judiciary's role in checking presidential authority. The outcome could set a precedent for how far a president can go in using executive orders to target specific entities or individuals.
WTF?
In a dramatic reversal, the Trump administration initially sought to drop the appeal earlier in the week before deciding to proceed with it.
Now What?
Watch for the appellate court's decision on whether the executive orders will be reinstated or permanently blocked. This case could escalate to the Supreme Court if the appellate decision is contested, potentially influencing future executive power limits.
Headline: A Trump Order Protected a Weedkiller. And Also a Weapon of War.
What?
On March 8, 2026, Hiroko Tabuchi of The New York Times reported that President Donald Trump issued an executive order prioritizing the production of glyphosate, a controversial weedkiller known as Roundup, citing national security. The order also protected the U.S.'s only supply of white phosphorus, a highly flammable munition manufactured by Bayer, which is used by the military for smoke screens and incendiary devices.
So What?
This executive order underscores the intersection of agricultural and military interests, highlighting Bayer's strategic leverage as the sole U.S. producer of both glyphosate and white phosphorus. It raises concerns about the prioritization of military needs over public health, given the ongoing legal battles and health risks associated with glyphosate.
WTF?
The executive order links the production of a common weedkiller to national security by tying it to the supply of a controversial munition, white phosphorus, which can cause severe burns and is notorious for its humanitarian impact.
Now What?
Watch for developments in Bayer's Supreme Court case scheduled for April, which could limit the company's liability in glyphosate lawsuits. Additionally, monitor the administration's research into alternatives to glyphosate and any legislative actions that may arise from Bayer's lobbying efforts. Further reading on the implications of this executive order and Bayer's legal challenges can provide additional context.
Headline: After slashing federal jobs, Trump administration ramps up hiring
What?
On March 9, 2026, The Washington Post reported that the Trump administration is increasing federal hiring after previously cutting hundreds of thousands of jobs. This shift is occurring under new rules that enhance White House influence over the 2-million person civilian workforce, with a focus on recruiting for health care, program management, and technology roles.
So What?
This hiring reversal indicates a strategic shift in the Trump administration's approach to federal workforce management, potentially increasing political influence over civil service roles. Critics argue this could undermine nonpartisan protections, while supporters claim it aligns government operations with elected leadership priorities.
Now What?
Watch for potential legislative or judicial challenges to the new hiring rules and their impact on civil service protections. The administration's "Tech Force" initiative and its outcomes could also influence future federal workforce strategies. Further developments may arise from ongoing lawsuits related to last year's dismissals.
Headline: Trump to forge ahead with immigration crackdown driven by top aide Stephen Miller
What?
On March 6, 2026, Reuters reported that U.S. President Donald Trump plans to continue his aggressive immigration crackdown, led by White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. Trump nominated U.S. Senator Markwayne Mullin as the new Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, following the dismissal of Kristi Noem due to controversies over immigration enforcement tactics.
So What?
The continuation of Trump's hardline immigration policies under Stephen Miller's guidance and the nomination of Markwayne Mullin could lead to sustained or increased enforcement actions, potentially affecting U.S. cities and immigrant communities. The Democratic blockade of Department of Homeland Security funding highlights ongoing political tensions and could impact the administration's ability to implement its agenda.
WTF?
Markwayne Mullin, a U.S. Senator and former mixed martial arts fighter, once challenged a union leader to a physical fight during a Senate hearing.
Now What?
Watch for the Senate confirmation process of Markwayne Mullin as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, which will require a majority vote. Additionally, monitor the ongoing funding negotiations for the Department of Homeland Security, as Democrats continue to push for changes in immigration enforcement tactics.
Headline: Prison guard who last saw Jeffrey Epstein alive made ‘suspicious’ cash deposits before his death
What?
Fresh documents from the United States Department of Justice reveal that Tova Noel, a correctional officer at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, made suspicious cash deposits totaling $5,000 on July 30, 2019, shortly before Jeffrey Epstein's death on August 10, 2019. The records, part of the so-called Epstein files, show that Noel and another officer, Michael Thomas, were accused of falsifying prison logs and failing to check on Epstein, who was found dead in his cell.
So What?
The revelations about the suspicious cash deposits and falsified logs raise further questions about the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death, potentially implicating prison staff in misconduct or cover-up efforts. This could lead to renewed scrutiny of the prison system's accountability and oversight mechanisms.
WTF?
An unnamed inmate claimed to have overheard a female officer saying, "If he is dead we’re going to cover it up and he’s going to have an alibi – my officers," on the morning of Epstein's death.
Now What?
Watch for any new investigations or legal actions stemming from the Department of Justice's release of documents related to Epstein's death. Further scrutiny of the Metropolitan Correctional Center's practices and oversight may also emerge as a result of these findings.
Headline: Trump threatens to block his own agenda over voting bill
What?
On March 9, 2026, President Donald Trump announced he would refuse to sign any bills until Congress passes the Republican Party's federalizing ID and citizenship requirement for voting in elections. This decision impacts a bipartisan housing reform bill currently on the Senate floor, which includes measures to limit institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes.
So What?
Trump's stance risks creating legislative gridlock, as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer indicated, potentially stalling significant legislative efforts, including housing reform. This move could also strain party unity, as Republican leaders acknowledge the lack of consensus needed to pass the voting bill with 50 GOP votes.
Now What?
Observers should watch for developments in the Senate regarding the housing reform bill and any shifts in Republican support for the voting bill. The potential for a talking filibuster by Democrats could also influence the legislative process. Key procedural milestones will be critical in determining the outcome of these legislative efforts.
Headline: Gavin Newsom wants ‘Kosplay Kristi’ Noem’s $220M ad money for LA’s fire victims
What?
On October 2023, California Governor Gavin Newsom demanded that the Department of Homeland Security redirect funds from a $220 million ad campaign, initiated by former Secretary Kristi Noem, to aid Los Angeles wildfire victims. Newsom criticized Noem for delaying Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funding for fire recovery, attributing the delay to her policy of personally approving contracts over $100,000.
So What?
This situation highlights ongoing tensions between state and federal authorities over disaster relief funding, potentially delaying critical recovery efforts in fire-affected areas. It underscores the political ramifications of administrative decisions on emergency management and resource allocation.
WTF?
Kristi Noem was mocked for appearing in tactical gear for photo ops, earning nicknames like “Kosplay Kristi” and “ICE Barbie.”
Now What?
Watch for any legislative or administrative actions by the Department of Homeland Security to address the funding delays and potential reallocations. Monitor any statements or actions from the Biden administration regarding FEMA funding policies and disaster relief priorities.
Headline: Poll: Trump struggles on immigration, prices and Iran as Democrats hold a midterm edge
What?
According to a national NBC News poll conducted from February 27 to March 3, 2026, majorities of registered voters disapprove of President Donald Trump's handling of key issues such as immigration, tariffs, and the conflict with Iran. The poll indicates that Democrats hold a 6-point lead over Republicans in the battle for control of Congress, as the midterm elections approach.
So What?
The poll results suggest potential challenges for Republicans in maintaining their narrow majorities in both the House and Senate. Disapproval of Trump's policies on critical issues like inflation and international conflicts could influence voter sentiment and impact the upcoming midterm elections, potentially shifting the balance of power in Congress.
Now What?
Observers should monitor upcoming legislative sessions and campaign strategies as both parties prepare for the midterm elections. Key developments to watch include any changes in immigration policy, economic measures addressing inflation, and further actions related to the conflict with Iran. The outcomes of these issues could significantly affect voter preferences and party control in Congress.
Headline: Federal Agents Accused of Targeting U.S. Citizens in Immigration Enforcement | WSJ
What?
On March 7, 2026, The Wall Street Journal reported that federal agents, under the Trump administration, have been accused of targeting U.S. citizens during immigration enforcement operations. The Department of Homeland Security, created in 2002, has allegedly turned its force against citizens, with 181 out of 279 people accused of attacking federal officers being U.S. citizens. Many of these citizens were never charged or convicted, yet their personal information was publicly shared, leading to significant personal and professional consequences.
So What?
This situation highlights a potential misuse of power by federal agencies, raising concerns about civil liberties and the treatment of U.S. citizens under immigration enforcement policies. The public backlash and legal challenges could lead to shifts in how immigration laws are enforced and how federal agencies are held accountable for their actions.
WTF?
In one instance, a federal agent claimed a woman assaulted them by forcefully pushing an agent’s hand against a cement wall, a charge that was later debunked by video evidence.
Now What?
Watch for potential legislative or judicial actions addressing the accountability of federal agencies in immigration enforcement. The firing of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem by President Trump suggests possible policy shifts. Further developments may arise from ongoing legal cases and public pressure for reform.
Headline: China Suspected in Breach of FBI Surveillance Network | WSJ
What?
On March 6, 2026, Dustin Volz reported that U.S. investigators suspect hackers affiliated with the Chinese government of breaching an internal Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) computer network. The network contains information related to domestic surveillance orders, and the breach is under investigation. The FBI has addressed the suspicious activities, but the scope and severity of the intrusion remain unclear.
So What?
If confirmed, this breach would represent another significant intrusion by Chinese hackers into U.S. law enforcement systems, potentially compromising sensitive surveillance data. It underscores ongoing cybersecurity vulnerabilities and the persistent threat posed by state-sponsored cyber espionage.
Now What?
Watch for further developments in the investigation and any potential legislative or regulatory responses aimed at strengthening cybersecurity measures within U.S. government agencies. Monitoring statements from the Senate Intelligence Committee and other relevant bodies will be crucial as the situation unfolds.
Headline: Federal Agents Are Intimidating Legal Observers at Their Homes: “They Know Where You Live”
What?
On March 5, 2026, The Intercept reported that federal immigration agents in Minnesota have been intimidating legal observers by following them to their homes and identifying them by name and address. This behavior, involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, has been documented across the Twin Cities, raising concerns about the expansion of federal surveillance capabilities.
So What?
This pattern of intimidation could deter legal observers from monitoring law enforcement activities, potentially infringing on First Amendment rights. The use of advanced surveillance tools by federal agents poses a significant threat to civil liberties and democratic norms.
WTF?
In one instance, a federal agent allegedly shouted a legal observer's name and home address in a mocking tone, highlighting the invasive nature of the surveillance.
Now What?
The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a federal lawsuit, Tincher v. Noem, seeking to bar these intimidation tactics and mandate policy changes. The case is pending in federal court in Minnesota, and its outcome could set important precedents for the protection of legal observers and their rights.
Headline: Where Trump's money comes from (and other mysteries)
What?
On October 2023, Philip Bump from How to Read This Chart analyzed President Donald Trump's complex financial network, highlighting nearly 400 limited-liability corporations (LLCs) that intertwine to form his income stream. The analysis was prompted by ProPublica's recent publication of a federal financial disclosures database, which revealed that many officials, including Trump, have investments in numerous corporations.
So What?
The intricate web of LLCs associated with Trump raises concerns about transparency and potential conflicts of interest, as it complicates the understanding of his financial dealings and tax obligations. This complexity underscores the challenges in holding public officials accountable for their financial activities.
WTF?
Trump Ruffin Commercial LLC is part of a convoluted ownership chain involving seven layers of LLCs, ultimately owned by The Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, illustrating the extreme complexity of Trump's financial network.
Now What?
Watch for potential legislative efforts to increase transparency in financial disclosures for public officials, which could address the opacity of such complex financial networks. Additionally, monitor any regulatory changes that might impact the use of LLCs for asset protection and tax purposes.
Headline: How Marco Rubio’s reshaping of US foreign policy was forged in Florida
What?
On March 7, 2026, Michael Van Sickler of the Tampa Bay Times reported that U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is significantly reshaping U.S. foreign policy, a transformation rooted in his experiences in Florida. Rubio's approach is compared to that of Dean Acheson, who served under President Harry Truman after World War II.
So What?
Rubio's influence on U.S. foreign policy marks a shift in diplomatic priorities and strategies, potentially affecting international relations and America's global standing. This change could lead to new alliances and conflicts, impacting global stability and U.S. interests abroad.
Now What?
Observers should monitor upcoming policy announcements from the State Department and any legislative actions in Congress that may support or challenge Rubio's foreign policy initiatives. Key developments in U.S. relations with countries like Venezuela and Cuba will be particularly telling.
Headline: Trump eyes surprise economic deal with Cuba
What?
On March 8, 2026, USA TODAY reported that the Trump administration is preparing to announce an economic deal with Cuba, potentially involving ports, energy, and tourism. President Donald Trump has indicated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio is negotiating with the Cuban government, and the deal could include easing travel restrictions for Americans to Havana.
So What?
This potential deal represents a strategic shift in U.S. foreign policy towards Cuba, moving from a confrontational approach to one that leverages economic incentives. It could alter the balance of power in the region by reducing Cuba's reliance on Venezuela and potentially opening new economic opportunities for U.S. businesses.
WTF?
President Trump suggested that Secretary of State Marco Rubio might only take an hour off after the U.S. concludes its military campaign in Iran before finalizing the deal with Cuba.
Now What?
Watch for official announcements from the White House regarding the specifics of the economic deal with Cuba. Additionally, monitor any legislative or regulatory changes that might accompany the easing of travel restrictions to Havana. Further developments in U.S.-Cuba relations could follow the conclusion of the U.S. military campaign in Iran.
Climate & Environment
Is the FBI Investigating Environmental Activists? | Insideclimatenews
What?
Inside Climate News reports that on March 8, 2026, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) visited a former member of Extinction Rebellion NYC, a climate activist group, as part of a broader investigation into environmental activists. This follows a national security memorandum issued by President Donald Trump, directing the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Forces to investigate entities involved in political violence and intimidation.
So What?
The FBI's actions signal an expansion of the Trump administration's scrutiny of political opposition, potentially impacting the civil liberties of activists engaged in nonviolent protest. This could lead to increased fear and self-censorship among activists, affecting their ability to organize and protest.
WTF?
During a training session, activists analyzed a video of European activists splattering soup on a Vincent van Gogh painting, noting the effectiveness of the protest despite the painting being protected by glass.
Now What?
Watch for potential legal challenges to the FBI's investigation tactics and any further directives from the Department of Justice regarding the scope of domestic terrorism investigations. The response from civil liberties organizations could shape future policy and legal standards.
What?
On March 7, 2026, Inside Climate News reported that Republican state legislatures in Alabama, Tennessee, Utah, and Kentucky are advancing "Sound Science" bills that limit state environmental regulations. These bills, supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, require state regulations to rely on the "best available science" and prevent state agencies from setting stricter standards than federal ones unless a direct causal link to harm is proven.
So What?
The legislation could hinder state agencies' ability to protect public health by setting an unattainable standard of proof for environmental regulations, potentially increasing the risk of health issues like cancer. Critics argue this shift prioritizes economic interests over public health and environmental protection.
Now What?
Watch for potential legal challenges to these bills and their implementation, particularly in Alabama, where the law includes a provision against using the Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System for water quality standards. The deadline for agencies to revise rules in compliance with the new law is nine months from its effective date.
Headline: After a Decade of Missteps, a Texas City Careens Toward a Water-Shortage Catastrophe
What?
On March 4, 2026, Corpus Christi, Texas, faces an imminent water crisis due to a historic five-year drought and a decade of failed city government efforts to build a seawater desalination plant. The depletion of water supplies threatens to disrupt jet fuel flow to Texas airports and oil exports from the Port of Corpus Christi, one of the nation's largest petroleum ports. City Manager Peter Zanoni and former officials like Sean Strawbridge have highlighted the potential for economic crisis and mass unemployment.
So What?
The water shortage in Corpus Christi could lead to a significant economic downturn, affecting energy markets and potentially causing mass layoffs and industrial shutdowns. The situation underscores the critical need for effective water management and infrastructure planning to prevent similar crises in other regions.
WTF?
Despite the looming crisis, Corpus Christi's largest industrial water users, including multi-billion-dollar refineries, remain exempt from emergency water curtailment plans.
Now What?
Watch for developments in Corpus Christi's $1 billion water projects and any state-level interventions to address the crisis. The city's water dashboard indicates a "Level 1 Emergency" is imminent, requiring immediate action to curtail water consumption. Legislative and regulatory responses from Texas officials, including Governor Greg Abbott, will be crucial in the coming months.
AI & Tech
Grok is actively misleading X users and I've lost count of the number of times this has happened.
— Shayan Sardarizadeh (@Shayan86) March 8, 2026
The videos of a boulevard in Tehran on fire that it says are from the 2017 LA fires have in fact all been filmed in Tehran tonight and can be easily geolocated and confirmed. https://t.co/pHYZtGKSlZ
Headline: When DOGE Unleashed ChatGPT on the Humanities
What?
On March 7, 2026, Jennifer Schuessler of The New York Times reported that the National Endowment for the Humanities, under the influence of President Donald Trump's administration, used ChatGPT to cancel nearly every active grant approved during the Biden administration. The Department of Government Efficiency, led by employees Justin Fox and Nate Cavanaugh, identified 1,477 problematic awards, resulting in the termination of over $100 million in funding, which was nearly half of the agency's annual budget.
So What?
The mass cancellation of grants has led to significant upheaval among organizations relying on this funding, with some projects forced to close. The actions have sparked lawsuits alleging violations of the First Amendment and the equal protection clause, highlighting a shift in power and priorities within the agency towards an "America First" agenda.
WTF?
The use of ChatGPT to determine the fate of humanities grants based on their relation to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) initiatives, including projects on the Holocaust and Black history, is a jarring example of technology-driven decision-making.
Now What?
Watch for developments in the lawsuits filed by the American Council of Learned Societies and others, which seek reinstatement of the grants and a historical record of the agency's actions. The outcome could set precedents for how federal agencies use artificial intelligence in decision-making. Further reading:
Headline: Travel firm Tui says it is using AI to create ‘inspirational’ videos
What?
On December 10, 2025, Tui, Europe’s largest travel operator, announced its significant investment in artificial intelligence (AI) to create "inspirational" videos and content, as well as to enhance customer service through AI-powered voice and chat agents. The company is focusing on generative engine optimisation (GEO) to improve its visibility in AI chatbot results, such as those from ChatGPT and Gemini, as part of its strategy to expand beyond traditional search engine optimisation (SEO).
So What?
This strategic shift by Tui indicates a broader trend in the travel industry towards integrating AI technologies to enhance customer engagement and streamline operations. By leveraging AI, Tui aims to reduce its reliance on traditional search engines like Google, potentially altering the competitive landscape in online travel services.
Now What?
Observers should monitor how Tui's investment in AI impacts its market share and customer satisfaction, as well as any regulatory developments concerning AI use in consumer services. Additionally, Tui's financial performance and cost-cutting measures, including a €250 million reduction by 2028, will be crucial to watch for potential impacts on its workforce and service offerings.
Headline: When AI Goes Negative: How Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT Handle Brand Criticism Differently
What?
On October 2023, BrightEdge reported that Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT handle negative brand mentions differently, with Google focusing on controversies and ChatGPT on product evaluations. The analysis covered the Apparel, Electronics, and Education industries, revealing that negative sentiment is rare but concentrated in specific query types.
So What?
This differentiation in handling negative sentiment by AI engines could impact brand reputation management strategies, as companies may need to monitor both platforms to fully understand their brand's perception. The findings suggest that brands could face criticism for different reasons depending on the AI engine, affecting how they address public relations and customer engagement.
Now What?
Brands should consider developing strategies to monitor and respond to AI-generated content across different platforms, particularly focusing on the informational phase where negative sentiment is most prevalent. Future regulatory developments in AI transparency and accountability could further influence how brands manage their online reputation.
Headline: It’s bots vs. reporters at the AP
What?
On March 3, 2026, Semafor reported on the internal tensions at the Associated Press (AP) regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in journalism. While some media companies, like Axel Springer, are embracing AI for its potential benefits, many journalists view it as a threat to their jobs. The AP is navigating this conflict as it considers how to integrate AI tools into its newsroom operations.
So What?
The adoption of AI in journalism could significantly alter the media landscape, potentially reducing the need for human reporters and changing how news is gathered and reported. This shift may lead to job losses and alter the traditional methods of journalism, impacting the quality and trustworthiness of news.
Now What?
Media organizations will need to monitor regulatory developments concerning AI use in journalism, as well as any industry standards that may emerge. Watching how major players like the New York Times and Axel Springer implement AI could provide insights into future trends and challenges.
Headline: OpenAI delays ChatGPT’s ‘adult mode’ again
What?
On March 7, 2026, OpenAI announced another delay in the launch of ChatGPT's "adult mode," a feature intended to provide verified adult users with access to adult content. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman initially announced the feature in October 2025, with plans for a December rollout, but it has been postponed to focus on enhancing the core ChatGPT experience.
So What?
This delay indicates OpenAI's prioritization of improving ChatGPT's intelligence and user experience over expanding its content offerings. It reflects a strategic decision to focus on broader user needs, potentially affecting the company's competitive positioning in the artificial intelligence market.
Now What?
Observers should watch for further announcements from OpenAI regarding the development and release timeline of the "adult mode." Additionally, any regulatory or public response to the feature's eventual launch could impact OpenAI's operational strategies.
Headline: LLM text data is drying up, but Meta points to unlabeled video as the next massive training frontier
What?
On October 2023, a research team from Meta FAIR and New York University published findings on training multimodal AI models from scratch, challenging existing beliefs about model construction. The study, involving Yann LeCun, explores using unlabeled video as a new data source due to the finite nature of high-quality text data.
So What?
The research suggests a shift in AI training paradigms, potentially reducing reliance on text data and opening new avenues for AI development using video data. This could lead to more efficient AI models that integrate visual and language processing without compromising performance.
Now What?
Watch for developments in AI training methodologies that incorporate video data, as well as any regulatory discussions on data usage and privacy implications. Further research may explore fine-tuning and reinforcement learning based on these findings.
Headline: Labor market impacts of AI: A new measure and early evidence
What?
On October 2023, Anthropic introduced a new measure called "observed exposure" to assess the risk of job displacement by artificial intelligence (AI). This measure combines theoretical large language model (LLM) capabilities with real-world usage data, focusing on automated and work-related uses. The study found that AI's actual impact on employment is currently limited, with occupations having higher observed exposure projected to grow less by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics through 2034.
So What?
The introduction of the "observed exposure" measure provides a framework for identifying jobs most vulnerable to AI displacement before significant effects become visible. This could influence labor market policies and workforce planning, as it highlights the potential for economic disruption in certain professions, particularly those with higher exposure to AI automation.
Now What?
Future developments to watch include updates to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projections and any legislative or regulatory measures addressing AI's impact on the labor market. Monitoring changes in AI adoption and its effects on employment will be crucial for policymakers and industry leaders.
Headline: US draws up strict AI guidelines amid Anthropic clash, FT reports
What?
On March 6, 2026, Reuters reported that the Trump administration has established strict rules for civilian artificial intelligence contracts, requiring companies to allow "any lawful" use of their models. This move comes amid a conflict between the Pentagon and Anthropic, which has been designated a "supply-chain risk," preventing its technology from being used in U.S. military contracts.
So What?
This development signifies a tightening of control over AI technology used in government contracts, potentially limiting the influence of companies like Anthropic that insist on stringent safeguards. It reflects a broader effort to ensure AI systems align with U.S. government interests and legal frameworks.
Now What?
Observers should watch for the finalization of these guidelines by the General Services Administration and any similar measures the Pentagon might adopt for military contracts. The impact on AI companies' compliance strategies and their future involvement in government projects will be crucial to monitor.
Headline: Iran and the immorality of OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google
What?
On a recent date, Robert Wright of Nonzero.org discusses the role of Anthropic's Claude AI in the U.S. military's target selection during the ongoing war with Iran. The Washington Post reported that Claude AI, integrated into Maven software operated by Palantir, suggested targets for U.S. strikes, including an elementary school hit on the first day of the war, resulting in the deaths of over 100 Iranian girls.
So What?
This involvement of AI in military operations raises significant ethical concerns about the use of technology in warfare, particularly when it results in civilian casualties. It highlights the potential for AI to exacerbate conflicts and the moral responsibility of tech companies like Anthropic in their collaborations with military entities.
WTF?
The use of AI to select military targets led to the bombing of an Iranian elementary school, killing more than 100 young girls, a death toll surpassing that of the worst American school shootings.
Now What?
Watch for potential regulatory or legislative actions addressing the use of AI in military applications, especially concerning international law and civilian protection. The ethical implications may prompt discussions in Congress or international forums about the accountability of tech companies in warfare.
Culture & Media
Headline: Politico founder plots new Washington newspaper war
What?
On March 6, 2026, Semafor reported that Robert Allbritton, founder of Politico and NOTUS, plans to expand NOTUS into a full-scale news operation in Washington, DC, potentially under a new name, The Washington Sun. This move aims to capitalize on the Washington Post's recent layoffs and brand challenges by recruiting top journalists from the Post.
So What?
This development could significantly alter the media landscape in Washington, DC, by introducing a new competitor to the Washington Post, potentially shifting the balance of power in political journalism and affecting the coverage of government affairs.
Now What?
Observers should watch for further announcements regarding the official launch of the new publication and any potential legal challenges related to the trademark application for The Washington Sun. Additionally, the recruitment of high-profile journalists from the Washington Post could signal shifts in media influence and coverage priorities in the capital.
Headline: Gen Z Lives in the Archive
What?
On October 2023, Katherine explores the cultural dynamics of Generation Z, arguing that streaming platforms and TikTok have created a cultural environment where Gen Z is disconnected from traditional generational influences. The piece discusses how Gen Z engages with a wide array of past music and culture, leading to a unique but potentially paralyzing cultural experience.
So What?
This cultural shift could lead to a breakdown in the traditional generational chain of artistic influence, potentially stifling new artistic creation. The overwhelming availability of past cultural artifacts may hinder Gen Z's ability to form a distinct cultural identity and innovate artistically.
WTF?
Katherine humorously describes approaching Gen Z individuals in a bar with "nutritional pellets and soothing rabbit noises" to discuss their music preferences.
Now What?
Observers should watch for how cultural institutions and platforms might adapt to support new artistic movements within this context. Monitoring changes in how streaming services curate and present content could provide insights into future cultural developments.
What the Right is Reading
Headline: ‘The Science Guy’ and Facts
What?
On February 25, Bill Nye criticized the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) decision to rescind its 2009 finding that greenhouse-gas emissions endanger public health. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) counters Nye's claims by citing data showing declines in smog levels, U.S. wildfires, and global droughts, as well as no significant trends in hurricane activity or sea-level rise.
So What?
The AEI's rebuttal to Bill Nye's criticism highlights a significant debate over the interpretation of environmental data and the EPA's regulatory decisions. This could influence public opinion and policy-making regarding environmental regulations and climate change mitigation strategies.
Now What?
Watch for potential legislative or judicial actions challenging the EPA's decision to rescind the 2009 finding. Monitoring upcoming reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and other scientific bodies will be crucial to understanding the evolving discourse on climate change impacts.
Headline: Previewing Suncor Energy v. Boulder County
What?
The Reason article discusses the upcoming legal case between Suncor Energy and Boulder County, scheduled for March 6, 2026. The case involves Boulder County's lawsuit against Suncor Energy, alleging environmental damages and seeking accountability for climate change impacts.
So What?
The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how energy companies are held accountable for environmental impacts, potentially influencing future litigation and regulatory actions against similar corporations.
Now What?
Observers should watch for the court's decision, which could impact future environmental litigation strategies and regulatory policies. Key developments in this case may also influence legislative discussions on environmental accountability.
Headline: What is a Woman: Protecting Women and Children from Gender Ideology - C-Fam
What?
On November 19, 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released a peer-reviewed study titled "Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria: Review of Evidence and Best Practices," which argues against the use of sex-rejecting procedures for treating pediatric gender dysphoria. The event, co-sponsored by the United States of America and several civil society organizations, will feature discussions from officials and advocates on the implications of these findings and proposed regulatory actions.
So What?
The report and subsequent regulatory proposals could significantly impact medical practices and parental rights concerning pediatric gender dysphoria treatments, potentially leading to a shift in how these issues are addressed legally and medically in the United States.
Now What?
Watch for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' proposed rulemaking to bar hospitals from performing sex-rejecting procedures on minors as a condition of Medicare and Medicaid participation. This regulatory action follows President Trump's Executive Order and could face legal challenges or influence future legislation.
Strays
Oh hell yes https://t.co/2o23cDv0qa
— Otto Von Tweetmarck (@OVTweetmarck) March 8, 2026
Headline: Your car’s tire sensors could be used to track you
What?
On February 25, 2026, researchers at IMDEA Networks Institute, along with European partners, revealed that Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS) in modern cars can expose drivers to tracking. Over a ten-week study, they collected signals from more than 20,000 vehicles, demonstrating that these sensors send unique, unencrypted IDs that can be captured by simple radio receivers, posing a significant privacy risk.
So What?
This discovery highlights a major privacy threat, as TPMS-based tracking is cheaper and harder to detect than camera-based surveillance. It underscores the urgent need for stronger security measures in vehicle sensor systems to prevent potential misuse of this technology for covert tracking.
WTF?
The necessary equipment to capture these signals costs only $100 per receiver, making it alarmingly accessible for anyone to track vehicles.
Now What?
Manufacturers and regulators must address the lack of encryption and authentication in TPMS to prevent passive surveillance. Monitoring developments in vehicle cybersecurity regulations will be crucial, as current standards do not specifically address these vulnerabilities.
Headline: When Is Insurance Worth It?
What?
On October 2023, Entropic Thoughts explores the decision-making process behind purchasing insurance, emphasizing the use of the Kelly criterion to determine its worth. The article critiques common misconceptions about insurance and provides mathematical guidance for evaluating insurance decisions, using examples like motorcycle and helicopter insurance scenarios.
So What?
The analysis highlights the importance of understanding the financial implications of insurance beyond superficial advice, potentially influencing how individuals and companies approach risk management. By applying mathematical principles, stakeholders can make more informed decisions that protect long-term financial growth.
Now What?
Future developments may include the introduction of more sophisticated insurance calculators that incorporate the Kelly criterion, potentially altering how insurance products are marketed and sold. Monitoring regulatory changes in the insurance industry could provide further insights into how these mathematical models are adopted.
